Expert Answer
Quick Answer
More, not less — around 1.6 g/kg of body weight per day, paired with resistance training. Older adults face anabolic resistance, so they need extra protein to trigger muscle synthesis. Attia argues higher protein is protective after 50-65 because sarcopenia and frailty — not mTOR — dominate aging risk. Calculate on ideal body weight.
Strong Consensus
on Protein overall
Targets 1.2-1.6 g/kg and aims near 2 g/kg; argues higher protein lowers all-cause mortality after 50-65 because human aging is driven by sarcopenia and falls, so the mouse low-protein-longevity finding doesn't transfer.
1.2-1.6 g/kg (up to 2 for recomposition) on ideal body weight, safe for healthy kidneys; notes anabolic resistance in aging is driven mostly by inactivity, and exercise redirects IGF-1 to muscle and away from cancer cells.
Own-voice eat-more-protein-for-longevity — 30-40g per meal, protein and fat before carbs — to fight age-related muscle loss, while noting an mTOR balance.
Rule of thumb ~1 gram per pound of ideal body weight, mostly whole foods; whey beats collagen for muscle due to higher leucine.
Plant-forward Blueprint (~25% protein); his one stated figure, 1.2-2.2 g/kg, comes from a bone-health video — agrees protein matters without muscle-maximalism.
After 50, the protein conversation flips: the risk isn't too much, it's too little. Older adults develop anabolic resistance — the same meal triggers less muscle-protein synthesis than it did at 30 — so they need more protein, not less, to maintain muscle. The practical target the quantitative experts converge on is about 1.6 g/kg of body weight per day, calculated on ideal (not current) body weight. Patrick lands at 1.2-1.6 g/kg (up to 2 for recomposition); Attia targets 1.2-1.6 and deliberately aims near 2 to buffer daily variability; Huberman's rule of thumb is ~1 gram per pound.
Why more is the longevity move — not a risk. The fear that high protein shortens lifespan (via IGF-1/mTOR) comes from guest Valter Longo, not from the five core experts as their own position. Attia's resolution: human aging after 50-65 is dominated by sarcopenia, frailty, and falls — so the mouse low-protein-extends-lifespan data doesn't transfer to people. He cites the epidemiological crossover where higher protein is associated with lower all-cause mortality after 50. Patrick's resolution: exercise redirects IGF-1 toward muscle and brain and away from cancer cells.
The non-negotiable attached to every number: resistance training. Anabolic resistance is driven mostly by inactivity, not age itself, and training restores the muscle-building response — which is why every quantitative expert conditions the higher-protein target on lifting. Distribute it across 3-4 meals of ~20-25g (Hyman suggests a 30-40g protein-forward first meal). One honest caveat: these targets assume healthy kidneys — Attia and Patrick both note the kidney-damage fear lacks clinical-trial support for healthy people, but those with kidney disease should consult a physician.
Around 1.6 g/kg of ideal body weight per day, paired with resistance training to overcome anabolic resistance — Attia frames more protein (not less) as protective after 50.
The low-protein view comes from guest Valter Longo, not the core experts. Attia argues sarcopenia dominates aging risk after 50-65, and Patrick notes exercise redirects IGF-1 to muscle.
For healthy kidneys, the experts say the damage fear lacks clinical-trial support (Attia, Patrick). Those with existing kidney disease should consult a physician first.
Across 3-4 meals of ~20-25g, with a protein-rich first meal (Hyman suggests 30-40g). Total daily protein matters more than the timing.
This page covers what researchers agree on. Pro gives you the specific dosages, timing schedules, and interaction warnings they each recommend — with video citations you can verify.
Cancel anytime
Full Protein Consensus Report
See what all the experts agree and disagree on