Expert Answer
Quick Answer
The experts converge on a repeatable checklist: (1) third-party tested for purity, potency, and contaminants; (2) carries a recognized cert — NSF, USP, ConsumerLab, Informed Sport, or IFOS for fish oil; (3) you can get a Certificate of Analysis; (4) it uses the right form and a clinical dose with minimal fillers; and (5) you set your own dose by blood testing where possible.
Prioritize brands third-party tested for purity, potency, and lack of contaminants, avoid unnecessary fillers and binders, and use blood testing to personalize your dose.
Vet products by reading the Certificate of Analysis and looking for independent testing to catch contaminants and fillers; look for NSF, USP, or ConsumerLab.
Match the form to the supplement — e.g. triglyceride-form omega-3 with an oxidation check via IFOS — and treat sourcing as the biggest safety risk.
Look for clinical doses, full ingredient transparency, and third-party testing (COAs) — the criteria he applies, though stated while contrasting his own product.
The experts don't agree on every supplement, but they converge on a remarkably consistent checklist for judging whether any given product is worth buying. Here it is, in the order they emphasize.
First: is it third-party tested? Huberman's rule is to prioritize brands that are third-party tested for purity, potency, and lack of contaminants, while avoiding products with unnecessary fillers or binders. Patrick calls sourcing the single biggest safety risk in the industry and tells you to rely on third-party tested brands. This is the non-negotiable first filter because, without pre-market regulation, it's the only external check that the label is true.
Second: does it carry a recognized certification? The marks the experts actually name are NSF/NSF International, USP, and ConsumerLab (Hyman), Informed Sport for batch/heavy-metal testing (reference material), and IFOS for fish oil (Patrick). Third: can you see a Certificate of Analysis? Both Attia and Hyman push past the seal to the batch-level COA — the lab report that exposes contaminants and fillers in the specific lot you're buying.
Fourth: is it the right form at a real dose, without junk? This is where quality meets efficacy. Patrick specifies the triglyceride form of omega-3 with an oxidation check; Attia flags that creatine gummies degrade and to use NSF-certified monohydrate powder; Johnson looks for clinical doses and full ingredient transparency (his criteria, though he states them while contrasting his own product, so take the standard and not the brand). Fifth and last: personalize the dose. Huberman's point is that the "right" amount varies widely between people, so blood testing is the best way to set your own dose rather than guessing from a label.
Put together, that's the whole game in an unregulated market: verify it's what it says it is (third-party tested, certified, COA available), make sure it's a useful form and dose without fillers, and calibrate the amount to your own body. Notably, none of the experts answer "how do I know it's good" by naming a brand — they teach the criteria, which is the point of this page.
Third-party testing. Every expert who discusses quality names it first — Huberman, Patrick, and Hyman all treat independent testing for purity and potency as the baseline filter.
The Certificate of Analysis (COA) for that batch, which reveals contaminants and fillers. Attia says to request one; Hyman vets products by reading them.
Yes. Patrick specifies triglyceride-form omega-3 with an IFOS oxidation check, and Attia flags that creatine gummies degrade — so use NSF-certified monohydrate powder instead.
Huberman recommends blood testing to personalize your dose, since individual needs vary widely and a label can't tell you what you specifically need.
This page covers what the experts actually say. Pro lets you chat with 1000+ hours of their research and get answers with the exact video citations behind them.
Cancel anytime