Expert Answer
Quick Answer
Creatine monohydrate. Attia calls it "the gold standard" and says the pricier forms add nothing. Buy a third-party-tested monohydrate powder such as an NSF-certified one. Skip gummies, which degrade. Huberman, Patrick and Hyman all name monohydrate too.
Universal Consensus
on Creatine overall
Calls creatine monohydrate the gold standard for strength, hypertrophy and cognition. Says the expensive alternative forms add no efficacy. Recommends NSF-certified powder and avoiding gummies.
Consistently specifies creatine monohydrate at 5g/day, and discusses higher-dose monohydrate for brain and TBI contexts - never a novel form.
Endorses the monohydrate form and its well-established safety profile, citing work with Darren Candow and Stuart Phillips.
Recommends creatine monohydrate for muscle, cognition and sleep support. Calls out women, who make less of it on their own.
Includes creatine at 5g/day in the Blueprint stack, though he doesn't specify monohydrate vs other forms.
This is one of the least contested questions in supplements. The best form of creatine is monohydrate. The fancier forms waste your money.
Attia is the most direct. He calls creatine monohydrate "the gold standard" for strength, hypertrophy and possible brain benefits. He says the pricier alternative forms add no efficacy.
With Layne Norton he repeats it: 5g is enough to saturate muscle, with no need for costlier forms. The rest reach for the same word. Huberman specifies creatine monohydrate at 5g/day, and discusses higher doses of monohydrate for brain and TBI work.
Patrick backs monohydrate and its safety record. Hyman points to women, who make less creatine on their own.
The real decision is quality, not chemistry. Attia says to buy a third-party-tested, NSF-certified monohydrate powder for purity. He warns off creatine gummies.
Manufacturing problems and degradation leave them underdosed. That is the theme across every "is this supplement good" question. With a commodity ingredient like monohydrate, you are paying for verified purity.
One clarification on "Creapure." It is a branded German-made, NSF-certified grade of creatine monohydrate. It is a purity spec, not a different molecule. It shows up in reference material, where the Diary of a CEO channel recommends it for perimenopausal women.
None of the five names it. And a note on the alternative forms. The five say expensive alternatives add nothing.
They do not name-check HCl, ethyl ester or buffered creatine in the material we analyzed. Read those as examples of the pricier forms to skip.
Monohydrate. Attia calls creatine monohydrate the gold standard and says expensive alternative forms offer no additional efficacy. Huberman, Patrick and Hyman all specify monohydrate as well.
No added benefit over monohydrate. Attia says the expensive alternative forms do not improve on it. He never names those three forms in our corpus, so read them as examples of the pricier options to skip.
Creapure is a branded German-made grade of creatine monohydrate that carries NSF certification. It is a purity spec, not a different molecule. It appears in reference material, but none of the five singles it out.
Powder. Attia recommends NSF-certified monohydrate powder and warns against gummies, which degrade and end up underdosed. Capsules can fall short on dose too.
Precis Pro
The answer above is the whole answer — every expert's position, where they disagree, and the timecode behind each one. Nothing on this page is held back.
Pro adds
$9/mo · Cancel anytime
Full Creatine Consensus Report
See what all the experts agree and disagree on